UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6324

THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM R. CREWS; UNNAMED POLICE OFFICERS;
CYNTHIA
MCCANTS,
Special
Agent;
MICHAEL
ANDERSON,
Detective;
MAGWOOD,
Detective;
WILLIAM SHEPARDS, Detective; PAUL TITLE,
Detective; MICHAEL RINGLEY, Detective; PAUL
MCMONIGAL,
Detective;
HOWARD,
Detective;
TURNER, Detective; MELERINE, Detective; LARRY
RICE, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:05-cv-01100-GRA)

Submitted:

July 14, 2006

Decided:

July 21, 2006

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se.

Hugh Willcox Buyck,
Darren K. Sanders, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:
Theodore Thomas Wagner seeks to appeal the district
courts order adopting the magistrate judges recommendation to
deny Appellees motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and
granting the parties additional time to file dispositive motions.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order

Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 3 -