Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Clark v. Queen City Recovery, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Edward Junior Clark filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1777

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Edward Junior Clark filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Clark v. Queen City Recovery, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Edward Junior Clark filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1777

    EDWARD JUNIOR CLARK,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; CARLYLE BRITT,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-00-372-3-MU)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2001

    Decided:

    October 25, 2001

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Edward Junior Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bland, WEAVER,
    BENNETT & BLAND, P.A., Matthews, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Junior Clark appeals the district courts order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.
    of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-

    372-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001).


    ment

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    We dispense with oral argucontentions

    are

    adequately

    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like