Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Miller, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Slade Miller's motion for reduction of sentence. Miller, a federal prisoner, sought reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 632 to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, but the appellate court agreed with the district court that Amendment 632 did not provide relief for Miller's motion. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the district court's ruling without requiring oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6994

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Slade Miller's motion for reduction of sentence. Miller, a federal prisoner, sought reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 632 to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, but the appellate court agreed with the district court that Amendment 632 did not provide relief for Miller's motion. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the district court's ruling without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Miller, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's denial of Slade Miller's motion for reduction of sentence. Miller, a federal prisoner, sought reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 632 to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, but the appellate court agreed with the district court that Amendment 632 did not provide relief for Miller's motion. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the district court's ruling without requiring oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6994

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SLADE MILLER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
    Judge. (CR-89-196)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2005

    Decided:

    October 21, 2005

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Slade Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Slade Miller, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000), based upon Amendment 632 to the Federal
    Sentencing Guidelines.

    Because Amendment 632 does not provide

    Miller the relief he seeks under 3582(c)(2), we affirm for the


    reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Miller,
    No. CR-89-196 (E.D. Va. filed June 9, 2005 & entered June 10,
    2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like