Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Reynolds, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit document summarizes Carl Reynolds' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Reynolds' appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of the § 2255 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6093

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit document summarizes Carl Reynolds' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Reynolds' appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of the § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Reynolds, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit document summarizes Carl Reynolds' appeal of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Reynolds' appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court's denial of the § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6093

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CARL REYNOLDS, a/k/a Neal,
    Azore, a/k/a Karl Reynolds,

    a/k/a

    Jermaine
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
    Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
    Senior District Judge. (CR-95-71, CA-98-381-5)

    Submitted:

    June 22, 1999

    Decided:

    August 6, 1999

    Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carl Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carl Reynolds seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Reynolds, Nos. CR-95-71; CA-98-

    381-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 12, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like