Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Proctor v. US Parole Comm, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Cortez Proctor's Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court's previous denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his detention by the United States Parole Commission. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the Rule 60(b) motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6885

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Cortez Proctor's Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court's previous denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his detention by the United States Parole Commission. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the Rule 60(b) motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Proctor v. US Parole Comm, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Maurice Cortez Proctor's Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court's previous denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his detention by the United States Parole Commission. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the Rule 60(b) motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6885

    MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED
    STATES
    BROOKS, Warden,

    PAROLE

    COMMISSION;

    JOSEPH
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:04-cv-00055)

    Submitted: September 28, 2006

    Decided: October 10, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Maurice Cortez Proctor, Appellant Pro Se. Jon K. Turner, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Maurice Cortez Proctor, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
    motion filed in his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) proceeding.

    We have

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Proctor v

    United States Parole Commn, No. 1:04-cv-00055 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30,
    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like