Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Herring v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Ricardo Herring filed a Title VII lawsuit against the Secretary of Health and Human Services alleging discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Herring appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing that Herring did not provide sufficient evidence of discrimination to overcome summary judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the issues adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1647

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ricardo Herring filed a Title VII lawsuit against the Secretary of Health and Human Services alleging discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Herring appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing that Herring did not provide sufficient evidence of discrimination to overcome summary judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the issues adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Herring v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricardo Herring filed a Title VII lawsuit against the Secretary of Health and Human Services alleging discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant. Herring appealed. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing that Herring did not provide sufficient evidence of discrimination to overcome summary judgment. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the issues adequately addressed in written submissions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1647

    RICARDO C. HERRING,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary of Health and
    Human Services,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-013824-8-AMD)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2004

    Decided:

    June 28, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C.,


    Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States
    Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricardo C. Herring appeals the district courts order
    granting Defendants motion for summary judgment in Herrings
    action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Herring v. Thompson, CA-01-3824-8-AMD (D. Md. May 12, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like