Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Coor v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Beautanous Coor, a federal prisoner. In the first appeal (No. 09-6026), Coor seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. The court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction as the order was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. In the second appeal (No. 09-6214), Coor appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas petition. The court affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error upon review of the record.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6026

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Beautanous Coor, a federal prisoner. In the first appeal (No. 09-6026), Coor seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. The court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction as the order was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. In the second appeal (No. 09-6214), Coor appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas petition. The court affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error upon review of the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views3 pages

    Coor v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two consolidated appeals by Beautanous Coor, a federal prisoner. In the first appeal (No. 09-6026), Coor seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. The court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction as the order was not a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. In the second appeal (No. 09-6214), Coor appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas petition. The court affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error upon review of the record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6026

    BEAUTANOUS COOR,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    No. 09-6214

    BEAUTANOUS COOR,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-00061-REP)

    Submitted:

    June 22, 2009

    Decided:

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    June 29, 2009

    No. 09-6026 dismissed; No. 09-6214 affirmed by unpublished per


    curiam opinion.

    Beautanous Coor,
    Assistant United
    Appellee.

    Appellant Pro Se.


    Robin Elaine Perrin,
    States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    In

    these

    consolidated

    appeals,

    Beautanous

    Coor,

    federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the magistrate judges order


    denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
    for

    appointment

    of

    counsel

    (No.

    09-6026),

    and

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2006) petition (No. 09-6214).
    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
    collateral
    54(b);

    orders,

    Cohen

    (1949).
    neither

    The
    a

    v.

    lack

    order

    final

    of

    U.S.C.

    Beneficial
    Coor

    order

    collateral order.
    for

    28

    1292
    Indus.

    seeks
    nor

    (2006);
    Loan

    to

    an

    Fed.

    337

    Corp.,

    appeal

    in

    appealable

    R.

    No.

    Civ.
    U.S.

    P.
    541

    09-6026

    is

    interlocutory

    or

    Accordingly, we dismiss appeal No. 09-6026

    jurisdiction.

    Coor

    v.

    Stansberry,

    No.

    3:08-cv-

    00061-REP (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 12, 2008, entered Dec. 13, 2008).
    We affirm No. 09-6214 for the reasons stated by the
    district
    reversible

    court,

    having

    error.

    Coor

    reviewed
    v.

    the

    Stansberry,

    (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 31, 2008).

    record
    No.

    and

    found

    no

    3:08-cv-00061-REP

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    No. 09-6026 DISMISSED
    No. 09-6214 AFFIRMED
    3

    You might also like