Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bea v. Green, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Marion L. Bea on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Bea's motion to appoint counsel and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6755

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Marion L. Bea on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Bea's motion to appoint counsel and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Bea v. Green, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Marion L. Bea on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It denied Bea's motion to appoint counsel and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6755

    MARION L. BEA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANK EDWARD GREEN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA96-3992-CCB)

    Submitted:

    August 11, 1998

    Decided:

    September 9, 1998

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Marion L. Bea, Appellant Pro Se. William James Chen, Jr., CHEN,
    WALSH, TECLER & MCCABE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Marion L. Bea appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Beas motion to appoint
    counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bea v.
    Green, No. CA-96-3992-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 21, 1997). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like