Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cain, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Bryant Roger Cain appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Cain a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Cain was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7447

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Bryant Roger Cain appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Cain a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Cain was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Cain, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Bryant Roger Cain appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Cain a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Cain was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7447

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BRYANT ROGER CAIN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
    (CR-93-277-WMN, CA-98-2297-WMN)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 1999

    Decided:

    March 30, 1999

    Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Bryant Roger Cain, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Bryant Roger Cain seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.

    See United States v. Cain, Nos. CR-93-277-

    WMN; CA-98-2297-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 21, 1998).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like