Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Douglas Davenport v. James F. Howard, Director, Virginia Penal System, and E. L. Paderick, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary, 520 F.2d 940, 4th Cir. (1975)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    William Davenport appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. The appeals court found no merit in Davenport's appeal and affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing with the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion that denied Davenport relief. The appeals court decision provided no additional context beyond affirming the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1975-06-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 520 F.2d 940 Docket: 74-2389

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Davenport appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. The appeals court found no merit in Davenport's appeal and affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing with the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion that denied Davenport relief. The appeals court decision provided no additional context beyond affirming the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    William Douglas Davenport v. James F. Howard, Director, Virginia Penal System, and E. L. Paderick, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary, 520 F.2d 940, 4th Cir. (1975)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Davenport appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by the district court. The appeals court found no merit in Davenport's appeal and affirmed the district court's decision, agreeing with the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion that denied Davenport relief. The appeals court decision provided no additional context beyond affirming the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    520 F.

    2d 940

    William Douglas DAVENPORT, Appellant,


    v.
    James F. HOWARD, Director, Virginia Penal System, and E. L.
    Paderick, Superintendent, Virginia State
    Penitentiary, Appellees.
    No. 74-2389.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 13, 1975.
    Decided June 12, 1975.

    William Douglas Davenport, pro se.


    James W. Hooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
    Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and WIDENER,
    Circuit Judges, and submitted.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and of the district court's opinion discloses that this
    appeal from the order of the district court denying relief under 42 U.S.C.
    1983 is without merit. Accordingly, the order is affirmed for the reasons stated
    by the district court. Davenport v. Howard, etc., et al., 398 F.Supp. 376
    (E.D.Va.1974).

    You might also like