Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Young v. US Dept of Transport, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    James Arthur Young filed a civil complaint against the United States Departments of Transportation and Commerce as well as several major automobile manufacturers. The district court denied relief on Young's complaint. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 10, 1998 order denying Young's complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2625

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Arthur Young filed a civil complaint against the United States Departments of Transportation and Commerce as well as several major automobile manufacturers. The district court denied relief on Young's complaint. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 10, 1998 order denying Young's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Young v. US Dept of Transport, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Arthur Young filed a civil complaint against the United States Departments of Transportation and Commerce as well as several major automobile manufacturers. The district court denied relief on Young's complaint. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 10, 1998 order denying Young's complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2625

    JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, for all persons injured in


    cars and light trucks as well as all killed in
    United States by auto or light trucks
    accidents,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION;
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GENERAL
    MOTORS CORPORATION, Detroit; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Detroit; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Detroit,
    Michigan; TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, Georgetown, Kentucky,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-982977-L)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se.

    February 5, 1999

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Arthur Young appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his civil complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    AccordSee Young

    v. United States Dept of Transp., No. CA-98-2977-L (D. Md. Sept.


    10, 1998).*

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The order from which Young appeals was filed on September 9,


    1998, and entered on the district courts docket September 10,
    1998, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See Wilson
    v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
    2

    You might also like