Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parham v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to John Wilson Parham on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in its July 16, 1998 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7107

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to John Wilson Parham on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in its July 16, 1998 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Parham v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to John Wilson Parham on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in its July 16, 1998 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7107

    JOHN WILSON PARHAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    H. R. POWELL, Warden, DFCC/SHCC; C. SYKES,
    Correctional Officer; S. LEWIS, Correctional
    Officer; A. JONES, Sergeant; S. TUCKER, Lieutenant; B. RHODES, Assistant Warden, SHCC; S.
    BEALE, Ombudsman, SHCC; R. TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, SHCC; W. F. SEAL, Hearings
    Officer, SHCC,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-98-594-2)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 1999

    Decided:

    February 23, 1999

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Wilson Parham, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    John Wilson Parham appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.
    Va. July 16, 1998).*

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See Parham v. Virginia, No. CA-98-594-2 (E.D.
    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    The order from which Parham appeals was filed on July 9,


    1998, and entered on the district courts docket sheet on July 16,
    1998. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), July 16,
    1998, is therefore the effective date of the district courts
    decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.
    1986).
    2

    You might also like