Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas E. Blanding v. William P. Rogers, Raymond M. Muncy James E. Johnson Bobby W. Soles v. Gaglio, 851 F.2d 356, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Thomas Blanding appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-07-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 851 F.2d 356 Docket: 88-6010

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Thomas Blanding appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Thomas E. Blanding v. William P. Rogers, Raymond M. Muncy James E. Johnson Bobby W. Soles v. Gaglio, 851 F.2d 356, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Thomas Blanding appealed the denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the lower court decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    851 F.

    2d 356
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Thomas E. BLANDING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    William P. ROGERS, Raymond M. Muncy; James E. Johnson;
    Bobby W. Soles; V. Gaglio, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6010.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 26, 1988.
    Decided: July 5, 1988.

    Thomas E. Blanding, appellant pro se.


    William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General (Office of the Attorney
    General of Virginia), for appellees.
    Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Thomas E. Blanding appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Blanding v. Rogers, C/A No. 87-2-L (W.D.Va.
    Mar. 10, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues
    recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like