Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Boyd v. Stone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) James F. Boyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against David Stone and Mary C. Hammond which was dismissed by the district court. 2) Boyd appealed the dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6263

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) James F. Boyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against David Stone and Mary C. Hammond which was dismissed by the district court. 2) Boyd appealed the dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Boyd v. Stone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) James F. Boyd filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against David Stone and Mary C. Hammond which was dismissed by the district court. 2) Boyd appealed the dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6263

    JAMES F. BOYD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVID STONE; MARY C. HAMMOND, MD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (CA-98-3734-23-6-AK)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 2000

    Decided:

    June 5, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James F. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,
    HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina; Ronald H. Colvin, COLVIN & FOSTER, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James F. Boyd appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the
    magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Boyd v. Stone, No. CA-98-3734-23-6-AK (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like