Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Calderon v. Sondervon, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Carlos Calderon appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2003 decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-07-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6285

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlos Calderon appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2003 decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Calderon v. Sondervon, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlos Calderon appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Maryland prison officials. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 13, 2003 decision. The Fourth Circuit declined to hold oral arguments, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6285

    CARLOS CALDERON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    ROBERT VIZZINI,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner; PATRICK
    CONROY, Warden; JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden;
    BURLIE FRINK, Security Chief; MICHAEL SYKES,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-02-2183-AW)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2003

    Decided:

    July 30, 2003

    Before MICAHEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Carlos Calderon, Appellant Pro Se.


    John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney
    General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carlos Calderon appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Calderon v.

    Sondervan, No. CA-02-2183-AW (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2003).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like