Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sider, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Mohammed Sider's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. After reviewing the record, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Sider, Nos. CR-93-83-A; CA-98-1028-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7642

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Mohammed Sider's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. After reviewing the record, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Sider, Nos. CR-93-83-A; CA-98-1028-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Sider, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Mohammed Sider's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. After reviewing the record, the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. Sider, Nos. CR-93-83-A; CA-98-1028-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7642

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MOHAMMED SIDER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-83-A, CA-98-1028-AM)

    Submitted:

    March 25, 1999

    Decided:

    March 31, 1999

    Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mohammed Sider, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mohammed Sider seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.

    See United States v. Sider, Nos. CR-93-83-

    A; CA-98-1028-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1998).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like