Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Craig Edward Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331." The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6498

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Craig Edward Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331." The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Craig Edward Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331." The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6498

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CRAIG EDWARD JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Dude,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:04-cr-00314-F-2)

    Submitted: July 25, 2006

    Decided: August 2, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Craig Edward Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.


    J. Frank Bradsher,
    Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
    North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Craig Edward Johnson appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    Place

    Holder

    Motion

    Challenging

    Subject

    Matter

    Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 1331. We have reviewed


    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Johnson, No. 5:04-cr-00314-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2006).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like