Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Romero Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Davis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6240

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Romero Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Davis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Romero Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied Davis' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Davis was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6240

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ROMERO DAVIS, a/k/a BeBe,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CR-98-360, CA-99-3879-19-0)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    August 29, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Romero Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Romero Davis appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United

    States v. Davis, Nos. CR-98-360; CA-99-3879-19-0 (D.S.C. filed Oct.


    23, 2000, entered Oct. 24, 2000; filed Jan. 23, 2001, entered Jan.
    24, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like