Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jamison v. FCC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Eugene Jamison, Sr. appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Federal Communications Commission. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2085

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eugene Jamison, Sr. appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Federal Communications Commission. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Jamison v. FCC, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eugene Jamison, Sr. appealed a district court order dismissing his complaint against the Federal Communications Commission. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2085

    EUGENE JAMISON, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
    (CA-05-2311-JFM)

    Submitted: May 18, 2006

    Decided: May 25, 2006

    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Jamison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene Jamison, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the

    district

    court.

    Jamison

    v.

    Federal

    CA-05-2311-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2005).

    Commcn

    Commn,

    No.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like