Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Middleton v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Stuart Middleton appealed the district court's denial of his third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the decision for the reasons stated by the district court in its August 18, 2005 order denying Middleton's third motion for reconsideration.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-03-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7525

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stuart Middleton appealed the district court's denial of his third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the decision for the reasons stated by the district court in its August 18, 2005 order denying Middleton's third motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Middleton v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stuart Middleton appealed the district court's denial of his third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court order and affirmed the decision for the reasons stated by the district court in its August 18, 2005 order denying Middleton's third motion for reconsideration.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7525

    STUART A. MIDDLETON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    G. A. JONES; J. SCHIFFIANO; JOHN DAVIS,
    Sergeant; H. WEBSTER; S. WARREN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-406)

    Submitted: February 23, 2006

    Decided: March 2, 2006

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stuart A. Middleton, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Stuart A. Middleton appeals from the district courts
    order denying his third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal
    of his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts order and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.

    See Middleton v. Jones, No. CA-04-406 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18,

    2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like