Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Matsch v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Kathryn Matsch appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendants in her Federal Tort Claims Act case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and that oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning in its June 16, 1999 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1925

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kathryn Matsch appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendants in her Federal Tort Claims Act case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and that oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning in its June 16, 1999 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Matsch v. United States, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kathryn Matsch appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendants in her Federal Tort Claims Act case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished opinion stated that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and that oral arguments would not aid their decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's judgment based on the reasoning in its June 16, 1999 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1925

    KATHRYN MATSCH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    UNITED STATES ARMY,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-443-5-2BR)

    Submitted:

    November 4, 1999

    Decided:

    November 9, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Kathryn Matsch, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kathryn Matsch appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to Defendants on Matschs claim under the Federal
    Tort Claims Act.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we
    See Matsch v.

    United States, No. CA-98-443-5-2BR (E.D.N.C. June 16, 1999).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like