Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pelham v. Cain, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    In this 3 sentence summary of the document: Paul Pelham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7393

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In this 3 sentence summary of the document: Paul Pelham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Pelham v. Cain, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    In this 3 sentence summary of the document: Paul Pelham appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7393

    PAUL EMMANUEL PELHAM,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KEITH CAIN; STEVEN LANIER; MARSHALL EVANS;
    CLINT SIMPSON; MICKEY SMITH,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-03-134-5-H)

    Submitted:

    January 28, 2005

    Decided:

    February 16, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul Emmanuel Pelham, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE,
    CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Emmanuel Pelham appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Pelham v.

    Cain, No. CA-03-134-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with


    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like