Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ortega, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jason Ortega's appeal of the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. The district court had construed Ortega's motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed it as untimely. The Court of Appeals independently reviewed the record and determined that Ortega did not make the requisite showing to justify issuing a certificate of appealability. Therefore, the Court dismissed Ortega's appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7304

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jason Ortega's appeal of the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. The district court had construed Ortega's motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed it as untimely. The Court of Appeals independently reviewed the record and determined that Ortega did not make the requisite showing to justify issuing a certificate of appealability. Therefore, the Court dismissed Ortega's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Ortega, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jason Ortega's appeal of the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. The district court had construed Ortega's motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed it as untimely. The Court of Appeals independently reviewed the record and determined that Ortega did not make the requisite showing to justify issuing a certificate of appealability. Therefore, the Court dismissed Ortega's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7304

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JASON ORTEGA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:98-cr-00047-JBF)

    Submitted: February 15, 2007

    Decided:

    February 22, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jason Ortega, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jason Ortega seeks to appeal the district courts order
    construing his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion as a 28 U.S.C.
    2255 (2000) motion and dismissing as untimely.

    The order is not

    appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate


    of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.

    28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2) (2000).

    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable


    jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
    by

    the

    district

    court

    is

    debatable

    or

    wrong

    and

    that

    any

    dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise


    debatable.

    Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

    Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d
    676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

    We have independently reviewed the

    record and conclude that Ortega has not made the requisite showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like