Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. David, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed LaCarlos Quanique David's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. In a per curiam opinion, the court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-97-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-01-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7489

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed LaCarlos Quanique David's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. In a per curiam opinion, the court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-97-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. David, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed LaCarlos Quanique David's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. In a per curiam opinion, the court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-97-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7489

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LACARLOS QUANIQUE DAVID,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-9, CA-00-97-4)

    Submitted:

    December 15, 2000

    Decided:

    January 5, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    LaCarlos Quanique David, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reinke, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    LaCarlos Quanique David seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-

    97-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like