Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dreuitt v. Jamaludeen, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Jon Dreuitt filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two medical professionals alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Dreuitt relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7342

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jon Dreuitt filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two medical professionals alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Dreuitt relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Dreuitt v. Jamaludeen, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jon Dreuitt filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two medical professionals alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Dreuitt relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its opinion, and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7342

    JON DREUITT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ABDUL JAMALUDEEN, Medical Doctor; BETH HOLCOMB, Registered
    Nurse, Medical Department Supervisor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00061-JRS)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2008

    Decided:

    August 7, 2008

    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jon Dreuitt, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, Elizabeth


    Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jon Dreuitt appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.
    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm
    court.

    Dreuitt

    Jamaludeen, No. 3:06-cv-00061-JRS (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2007).

    v.
    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like