Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ryan Little, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ryan O'Neil Little's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials, the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6828

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ryan O'Neil Little's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials, the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Ryan Little, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ryan O'Neil Little's motion for reduction of sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). As the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the court materials, the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6828

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RYAN ONEIL LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2011

    Decided:

    November 23, 2011

    Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ryan ONeil Little, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,


    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ryan ONeil Little appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-

    00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 15, 2011).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like