Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Dugger, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to reduce Maurice Dugger's sentence within the reduced sentencing guideline range. The district court had granted Dugger's motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to a statute allowing such reductions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination of where within the reduced range to impose the sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-02-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7691

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to reduce Maurice Dugger's sentence within the reduced sentencing guideline range. The district court had granted Dugger's motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to a statute allowing such reductions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination of where within the reduced range to impose the sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Dugger, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to reduce Maurice Dugger's sentence within the reduced sentencing guideline range. The district court had granted Dugger's motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to a statute allowing such reductions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination of where within the reduced range to impose the sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7691

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MAURICE DUGGER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Huntington.
    Robert C. Chambers,
    District Judge. (3:05-cr-00197-1)

    Submitted:

    January 30, 2009

    Decided:

    February 24, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Maurice Dugger, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Lynn Dillon, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Maurice Dugger appeals from the district courts order
    granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006), arguing that the district court abused
    its

    discretion

    guideline

    in

    range,

    to

    determining
    impose

    where,

    sentence.

    record and find no reversible error.

    within
    We

    have

    the

    reduced

    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Dugger, No. 3:05-cr-00197-1 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 7, 2008); see U.S.


    Sentencing
    dispense

    Guidelines
    with

    oral

    Manual
    argument

    1B1.10
    because

    cmt.

    n.1(B)(iii).

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like