Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ford, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lemonze Ford's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument because it would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7144

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lemonze Ford's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument because it would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Ford, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lemonze Ford's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in materials before the lower court, the appellate court dispensed with oral argument because it would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7144

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    LEMONZE E. FORD,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (7:03-cr-01094-HFF-14)

    Submitted:

    April 16, 2009

    Decided:

    April 22, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lemonze E. Ford, Appellant Pro Se.


    Elizabeth Jean Howard,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lemonze
    denying

    his

    E.

    motion

    Ford
    for

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    sentence

    (D.S.C.

    filed

    facts

    contentions

    materials

    before

    reduction

    courts

    under

    18

    order
    U.S.C.

    United States v. Ford, No. 7:03-cr-

    We

    legal

    district

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    June 17, 2008).


    and

    the

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    by the district court.


    01094-HFF-14

    appeals

    the

    dispense

    court

    June
    with

    13,

    oral

    2008,

    argument

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    because

    presented

    would

    entered

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like