Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown v. Stienke, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Michael Anthony Brown under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of relief. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7064

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Michael Anthony Brown under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of relief. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Brown v. Stienke, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Michael Anthony Brown under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The court denied Brown's motion for appointment of counsel, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous denial of relief. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7064

    MICHAEL ANTHONY BROWN,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    DANIEL L. STIENEKE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-364-5-BR2)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 1999

    Decided:

    February 5, 1999

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Anthony Brown seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny Browns motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
    the district court.

    See Brown v. Stieneke, No. CA-98-364-5-BR2

    (E.D.N.C. June 23, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like