Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Lyndell Thomas appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for reduction of sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Thomas's motion for the reasons stated in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7972

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Lyndell Thomas appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for reduction of sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Thomas's motion for the reasons stated in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Lyndell Thomas appealed the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for reduction of sentence. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Thomas's motion for the reasons stated in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7972

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LYNDELL THOMAS, a/k/a X-Man,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville.
    W. Earl Britt,
    Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00058-BR-3)

    Submitted:

    March 30, 2010

    Decided:

    April 5, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lyndell Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lyndell

    Thomas

    appeals

    the

    district

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006) motion.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Thomas, No. 3:93-cr-00058-BR-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    order

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like