Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nathan O. Marshall v. Joseph J. Bauer, Administrator, Florence Detention Center, F.S.C., 803 F.2d 1181, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's refusal to grant relief to Nathan O. Marshall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Joseph J. Bauer, Administrator of the Florence Detention Center. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had also been recently decided authoritatively, so the appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-10-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 803 F.2d 1181 Docket: 86-7182

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's refusal to grant relief to Nathan O. Marshall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Joseph J. Bauer, Administrator of the Florence Detention Center. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had also been recently decided authoritatively, so the appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Nathan O. Marshall v. Joseph J. Bauer, Administrator, Florence Detention Center, F.S.C., 803 F.2d 1181, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's refusal to grant relief to Nathan O. Marshall under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his case against Joseph J. Bauer, Administrator of the Florence Detention Center. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The dispositive issues had also been recently decided authoritatively, so the appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    803 F.

    2d 1181
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nathan O. MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Joseph J. BAUER, Administrator, Florence Detention Center,
    F.S.C.; Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 86-7182.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 29, 1986.
    Decided Oct. 27, 1986.

    Nathan O. Marshall, appellant pro se.


    C. Dexter Powers, for appellee.
    D.S.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, ERVIN and WILKINSON Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order
    refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with
    oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district
    court. Marshall v. Bauer, C/A No. 84-2311 (D.S.C., June 11, 1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like