Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Carr V., 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    A federal prisoner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-judgment motion for production of his sentencing transcript. The appellate court reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied the prisoner's motion on May 25, 2005, making the mandamus petition moot. The appellate court therefore denied the petition and granted the prisoner's request to proceed in forma pauperis without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-06-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6129

    Original Title

    In re: Carr v., 4th Cir. (2005)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    A federal prisoner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-judgment motion for production of his sentencing transcript. The appellate court reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied the prisoner's motion on May 25, 2005, making the mandamus petition moot. The appellate court therefore denied the petition and granted the prisoner's request to proceed in forma pauperis without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: Carr V., 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    A federal prisoner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his post-judgment motion for production of his sentencing transcript. The appellate court reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied the prisoner's motion on May 25, 2005, making the mandamus petition moot. The appellate court therefore denied the petition and granted the prisoner's request to proceed in forma pauperis without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6129

    In Re:

    HARLANDO OMAR CARR,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    June 10, 2005

    (CR-96-20-H)

    Decided:

    June 22, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Harlando Omar Carr, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Harlando Omar Carr, a federal prisoner, petitions for a
    writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed
    acting on his post-judgment motion for production of his sentencing
    transcript.

    He seeks an order from this court directing the

    district court to act.


    the

    district

    court

    Our review of the docket sheet reveals that


    denied

    Carrs

    motion

    on

    May

    25,

    2005.

    Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Carrs


    motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
    proceed in forma pauperis.

    We grant leave to

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like