Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dudley v. Hamidullah, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Anthony Dudley's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6843

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Anthony Dudley's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Dudley v. Hamidullah, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Kevin Anthony Dudley's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6843

    KEVIN ANTHONY DUDLEY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee,
    and
    BUREAU OF PRISONS,
    Respondent.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (2:07-cv-00022-JFA)

    Submitted:

    August 8, 2007

    Decided:

    August 21, 2007

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin Anthony Dudley, Appellant Pro Se.


    Emily Yolanda Howard,
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin Anthony Dudley, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order and judgment accepting the recommendation of
    the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2241
    (West 2006 & Supp. 2007) petition.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    Dudley v. Hamidullah, No. 2:07-cv-

    00022-JFA (D.S.C. May 24, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like