Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Heikes v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Trinda Heikes appealed a district court's dismissal of her claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment against the Postmaster General and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. An unpublished per curiam opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-07-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1630

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Trinda Heikes appealed a district court's dismissal of her claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment against the Postmaster General and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. An unpublished per curiam opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Heikes v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Trinda Heikes appealed a district court's dismissal of her claims of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment against the Postmaster General and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. An unpublished per curiam opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1630

    TRINDA L. HEIKES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,
    USPS; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-01-268-7)

    Submitted:

    July 12, 2001

    Decided:

    July 19, 2001

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Trinda L. Heikes, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Trinda L. Heikes appeals the district courts order dismissing
    her claim of discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1915 (West Supp. 2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    Heikes v. Henderson, No. CA-01-268-7 (W.D. Va.

    filed Apr. 11, 2001; entered Apr. 12, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like