Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. v. Edward Brennan Joseph J. Curran, Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 16, 1996. It involves petitioner Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. appealing the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its own review of the record. The Fourth Circuit cites the reasoning of the district court opinion in denying Queen's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 470 Docket: 95-7541

    Original Title

    Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. v. Edward Brennan Joseph J. Curran, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 16, 1996. It involves petitioner Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. appealing the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its own review of the record. The Fourth Circuit cites the reasoning of the district court opinion in denying Queen's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. v. Edward Brennan Joseph J. Curran, Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from February 16, 1996. It involves petitioner Nicholas J. Queen, Sr. appealing the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion or in its own review of the record. The Fourth Circuit cites the reasoning of the district court opinion in denying Queen's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    77 F.

    3d 470

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nicholas J. QUEEN, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward BRENNAN; Joseph J. Curran, Attorney General of
    the
    State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 95-7541.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 6, 1996
    Decided Feb. 16, 1996.

    Nicholas J. Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn L. Grill, SMITH,


    SOMERVILLE & CASE, Baltimore, Maryland; Jefferson McClure Gray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. 2255
    (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Queen v. Brennan, No. CA-95-859-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 22,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like