Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Enriquez, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Enriquez's motion to clarify whether his sentences would run concurrently. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its November 6, 2003 decision and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-08-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6009

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Enriquez's motion to clarify whether his sentences would run concurrently. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its November 6, 2003 decision and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Enriquez, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Richard Enriquez's motion to clarify whether his sentences would run concurrently. The three-judge panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its November 6, 2003 decision and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6009

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD ENRIQUEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-97-173-MU)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2004

    Decided:

    August 16, 2004

    Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Richard Enriquez, Appellant Pro Se.


    Douglas Scott Broyles,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Richard

    Enriquez

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his motion to clarify the courts intention as to


    the concurrent nature of his sentence.*
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Enriquez, No. CR-97-173-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2003).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Contrary to the governments assertion, Enriquez timely filed


    his notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), 26(a)(2).
    - 2 -

    You might also like