Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. R. L. McKinney, 432 F.2d 562, 4th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    R.L. McKinney appealed his conviction in district court for possession of an illegal firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c). The appeals court affirmed the conviction, finding no merit to McKinney's arguments that there was insufficient evidence of possession, that the firearm was illegally seized, and that the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay evidence. The appeals court concluded there was no error in McKinney's conviction after reviewing the record, briefs, and appendix.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-10-01 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 432 F.2d 562 Docket: 14781

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    R.L. McKinney appealed his conviction in district court for possession of an illegal firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c). The appeals court affirmed the conviction, finding no merit to McKinney's arguments that there was insufficient evidence of possession, that the firearm was illegally seized, and that the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay evidence. The appeals court concluded there was no error in McKinney's conviction after reviewing the record, briefs, and appendix.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    United States v. R. L. McKinney, 432 F.2d 562, 4th Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    R.L. McKinney appealed his conviction in district court for possession of an illegal firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c). The appeals court affirmed the conviction, finding no merit to McKinney's arguments that there was insufficient evidence of possession, that the firearm was illegally seized, and that the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay evidence. The appeals court concluded there was no error in McKinney's conviction after reviewing the record, briefs, and appendix.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    432 F.

    2d 562

    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,


    v.
    R. L. McKINNEY, Appellant.
    No. 14781.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Oct. 1, 1970.

    William L. Osteen, U. S. Atty., and J. Howard Coble, Asst. U. S. Atty., on


    brief for appellee.
    Before BRYAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant R. L. McKinney was tried and convicted by the District Court for the
    Middle District of North Carolina on April 22, 1970 for possession of an illegal
    firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. 5861(c). After careful consideration of the
    record, briefs and appendix, we affirm. There is no merit to appellant's
    contentions that there was insufficient evidence of possession, that the firearm
    was illegally seized, and that the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay
    evidence.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like