Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Spencer v. Rumsfeld, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between William W. Spencer, Jr. and Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Spencer's complaint after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-2244

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between William W. Spencer, Jr. and Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Spencer's complaint after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Spencer v. Rumsfeld, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between William W. Spencer, Jr. and Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Spencer's complaint after reviewing the record and finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-2244

    WILLIAM W. SPENCER, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense,
    U.S. Department of Defense, Pentagon,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:05-cv-00730-CMH)

    Submitted:

    July 6, 2007

    Decided:

    July 24, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paula M. Potoczak, Traci L. Buschner, PAULA M. POTOCZAK, L.L.C.,


    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States
    Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William W. Spencer, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order dismissing Spencers complaint.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Spencer v. Rumsfeld, No.

    1:05-cv-00730-CMH (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like