Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Patterson v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Nathaniel Patterson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Patterson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its July 13, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7405

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Nathaniel Patterson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Patterson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its July 13, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Patterson v. Commonwealth of VA, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Nathaniel Patterson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on Patterson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its July 13, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7405

    NATHANIEL PATTERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
    OF CORRECTIONS; RED, WHITE AND BLUE LABEL'S
    WHEEL OF FORTUNE TELEVISION BROADCASTING COMPANY; RED, WHITE AND BLUE SWEEPSTAKES; WHEEL
    OF FORTUNE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-95-750-AM)
    Submitted:

    December 12, 1995

    Decided:

    January 11, 1996

    Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nathaniel Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Patterson v. Virginia, No. CA-95-750-AM (E.D. Va. July 13,
    1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like