Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr. v. Prince Edward County Jail, Gene Southall, Sheriff, 838 F.2d 466, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr. that was dismissed by the district court for failure to respond to interrogatories. The appellate court had previously affirmed the dismissal. Hill then filed a "Motion to Appeal Dismissed Action" in district court, which was denied on the grounds that the matter had already been appealed and affirmed. The appellate court here affirms the denial of Hill's motion, finding no grounds to vacate the earlier judgment under Rule 60 and that the appeal was without merit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 838 F.2d 466 Docket: 87-7713

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr. that was dismissed by the district court for failure to respond to interrogatories. The appellate court had previously affirmed the dismissal. Hill then filed a "Motion to Appeal Dismissed Action" in district court, which was denied on the grounds that the matter had already been appealed and affirmed. The appellate court here affirms the denial of Hill's motion, finding no grounds to vacate the earlier judgment under Rule 60 and that the appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr. v. Prince Edward County Jail, Gene Southall, Sheriff, 838 F.2d 466, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr. that was dismissed by the district court for failure to respond to interrogatories. The appellate court had previously affirmed the dismissal. Hill then filed a "Motion to Appeal Dismissed Action" in district court, which was denied on the grounds that the matter had already been appealed and affirmed. The appellate court here affirms the denial of Hill's motion, finding no grounds to vacate the earlier judgment under Rule 60 and that the appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    838 F.

    2d 466
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Raymond Sidney HILL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY JAIL, Gene Southall, Sheriff,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 87-7713.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 21, 1987.
    Decided Jan. 27, 1988.

    Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr., appellant pro se.


    Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Raymond Sidney Hill, Jr., filed a 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint which was
    dismissed for failure to respond to certain interrogatories as required by the
    district court. The dismissal was affirmed on appeal. Hill v. Prince Edward
    County Jail, No. 86-7717 (4th Cir. Mar. 6, 1987). Thereafter, Hill filed a
    "Motion to Appeal Dismissed Action." The district court denied Hill's motion
    as the matter had been appealed and the dismissal affirmed. On appeal Hill
    challenges the denial of his motion.

    Hill's motion presents no ground for vacating the earlier judgment under
    Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. Upon review of the record and the district court's order, we
    find this appeal to be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently
    have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm

    the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Prince Edward
    County Jail, C/A No. MISC 86-290-N (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 1987).
    3

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like