Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Deberry, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Eddie Columbus Deberry appealed the district court's denial of his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied Deberry's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6843

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Eddie Columbus Deberry appealed the district court's denial of his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied Deberry's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Deberry, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Eddie Columbus Deberry appealed the district court's denial of his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court denied Deberry's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6843

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    EDDIE COLUMBUS DEBERRY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-96-14-V, CA-00-74-5-1-V)
    Submitted:

    July 25, 2002

    Decided:

    August 2, 2002

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eddie Columbus Deberry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Eddie Columbus Deberry seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255
    (West Supp. 2002).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    United States v. Deberry, Nos.

    CR-96-14-V; CA-00-74-5-1-V (W.D.N.C. May 2, 2002).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like