Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. John Francis Holly, 474 F.2d 1400, 4th Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit considered an appeal from John Francis Holly regarding his conviction. Upon reviewing the record and Holly's brief, the three-judge panel found no errors that would warrant reversing the decision. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1973-04-09 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 474 F.2d 1400 Docket: 71-1870

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit considered an appeal from John Francis Holly regarding his conviction. Upon reviewing the record and Holly's brief, the three-judge panel found no errors that would warrant reversing the decision. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    United States v. John Francis Holly, 474 F.2d 1400, 4th Cir. (1973)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit considered an appeal from John Francis Holly regarding his conviction. Upon reviewing the record and Holly's brief, the three-judge panel found no errors that would warrant reversing the decision. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal without holding oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    474 F.

    2d 1400

    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,


    v.
    John Francis HOLLY, Appellant.
    No. 71-1870.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 23, 1973.
    Decided April 9, 1973.

    Norman N. Yankellow, Baltimore, Md., on brief for appellant.


    Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., and Francis S. Brocato, Asst. U. S. Atty.,
    on brief for appellee.
    Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    This appeal comes before us on a motion by the Government to dismiss or, in


    the alternative, for summary affirmance.

    Upon consideration of the record and the brief filed by the appellant we find no
    error sufficient to warrant or command reversal. Therefore, we dispense with
    oral argument and grant the motion of the Government to dismiss the appeal.

    You might also like