Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that affirms a district court's denial of James Leonardo Powell's request for an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the extension. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7057

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that affirms a district court's denial of James Leonardo Powell's request for an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the extension. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Powell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that affirms a district court's denial of James Leonardo Powell's request for an extension of time to file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the extension. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7057

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAMES LEONARDO POWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-99-24-FO)

    Submitted:

    August 29, 2002

    Decided:

    September 9, 2002

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James Leonardo Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James Leonardo Powell appeals the district courts order
    denying his request for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.
    2255 (2000) motion.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States v.

    Powell, No. CR-99-24-FO (E.D.N.C. filed June 7, 2002 & entered June
    10, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like