Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Coleman, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Coleman's motion for a reduction of sentence. Coleman had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7935

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Coleman's motion for a reduction of sentence. Coleman had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Coleman, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Michael Anthony Coleman's motion for a reduction of sentence. Coleman had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7935

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL ANTHONY COLEMAN, a/k/a Killer,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
    John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (2:01-cr-00021-JPB-DJJ)

    Submitted:

    March 30, 2010

    Decided:

    April 2, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Anthony Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephen Donald
    Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia;
    Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Sherry L.
    Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Anthony Coleman appeals the district courts
    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
    reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.

    United States v. Coleman, No. 2:01-cr-

    00021-JPB-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Oct. 8, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like