Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shell v. Pruitt, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Robert Edward Lee Shell appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Charles Pruitt and William Massello. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7444

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Edward Lee Shell appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Charles Pruitt and William Massello. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Shell v. Pruitt, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Edward Lee Shell appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Charles Pruitt and William Massello. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7444

    ROBERT EDWARD LEE SHELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHARLES PRUITT; WILLIAM MASSELLO, III, Doctor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Glen E. Conrad, District
    Judge. (7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu)

    Submitted:

    January 14, 2010

    Decided:

    January 21, 2010

    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Edward Lee Shell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Edward Lee Shell appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint pursuant
    to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(2) (2006).
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Shell v. Pruitt, No.

    7:09-cv-00278-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. July 15, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like