Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • David Wicks v. Walmart Department Stores, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on David Bryant Wick's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 2014 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7152

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on David Bryant Wick's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 2014 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    David Wicks v. Walmart Department Stores, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on David Bryant Wick's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its July 2014 ruling. The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7152

    DAVID BRYANT WICKS,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    WALMART DEPARTMENT STORES; JUSTIN SHERMAN; MIKE WHITE;
    CAMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN F. JONES; SALISBURY
    POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BARKLEY; CHRISTOPHER LANE;
    GEORGE KALOROUMAKIS; WARDEN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-02293-RDB)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2014

    Before DUNCAN
    Circuit Judge.

    and

    DIAZ,

    Circuit

    Decided:

    Judges,

    December 18, 2014

    and

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David Bryant Wicks appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Wicks v. Walmart Dept Stores, No. 1:14-cv-02293-RDB (D.

    Md. filed July 28 & entered July 29, 2014).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like