Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Larry Robinson v. Mrs. Laughdin, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Larry Robinson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several record room supervisors and assistants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7703

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Robinson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several record room supervisors and assistants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Larry Robinson v. Mrs. Laughdin, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Robinson appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several record room supervisors and assistants. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit decided oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7703

    LARRY ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MRS. LAUGHDIN, Record Room Supervisor; MRS. GREEN, Record
    Room Supervisor; MRS. REEDY, Record Room Assistant; JANE
    DOE,
    Record
    Room
    Supervisor;
    JANE
    DOE,
    Record
    Room
    Assistant; JANE DOE, Record Room Assistant; JANE DOE, Record
    Room Assistant,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:14-cv-00172-MSD-TEM)

    Submitted:

    February 12, 2015

    Decided:

    February 19, 2015

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry
    dismissing

    his

    Robinson
    42

    U.S.C.

    appeals

    the

    1983

    district

    (2012)

    courts

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    order

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    Robinson v. Laughdin, No. 2:14-cv-00172-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct.


    17, 2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like