Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lionel Williams, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lionel Elizah Williams' motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his criminal case record pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The unpublished, per curiam opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6374

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lionel Elizah Williams' motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his criminal case record pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The unpublished, per curiam opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Lionel Williams, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lionel Elizah Williams' motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his criminal case record pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The unpublished, per curiam opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6374

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LIONEL ELIZAH WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Robert G. Doumar, Senior
    District Judge. (2:90-cr-00149-JAM-2)

    Submitted:

    May 24, 2012

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    DAVIS,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 31, 2012

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lionel Elizah Williams, Appellant Pro Se.


    Neil H. MacBride,
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lionel

    Elizah

    Williams

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error


    pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
    and find no reversible error.
    reasons

    v.

    Williams, No. 2:90-cr-00149-JAM-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2012).

    We

    with

    by

    oral

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for the


    States

    dispense

    stated

    We have reviewed the record

    district

    argument

    court.

    because

    the

    United

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like