Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Calvin Driver, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Calvin Watty Driver appealed a district court order denying his motion to file a late § 2255 motion. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The district court had provided reasons for denying the motion as untimely, which the Fourth Circuit agreed with. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6607

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvin Watty Driver appealed a district court order denying his motion to file a late § 2255 motion. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The district court had provided reasons for denying the motion as untimely, which the Fourth Circuit agreed with. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Calvin Driver, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvin Watty Driver appealed a district court order denying his motion to file a late § 2255 motion. A panel of the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. The panel reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. The district court had provided reasons for denying the motion as untimely, which the Fourth Circuit agreed with. The panel dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6607

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    CALVIN WATTY DRIVER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (2:05-cr-00217-GCM-DLH-1)

    Submitted:

    June 25, 2015

    Decided:

    June 30, 2015

    Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Calvin Watty Driver, Appellant Pro Se.


    Donald David Gast, Amy
    Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North
    Carolina; William Michael Miller, Jennifer A. Youngs, Assistant
    United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Calvin

    Watty

    Driver

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for leave to file a 2255 motion as timely.


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    States

    (W.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 2015).

    v.

    Driver,

    No.

    2:05-cr-00217-GCM-DLH-1

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like