Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Allen Lamont v. Sgt. Crews, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Allen Lamont appealed a district court decision denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6750

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Allen Lamont appealed a district court decision denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Allen Lamont v. Sgt. Crews, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Allen Lamont appealed a district court decision denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two prison officials. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6750

    ALLEN R. LAMONT,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    SGT. CREWS; CPT. MAURICE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:14-cv-00853-CMH-IDD)

    Submitted:

    August 27, 2015

    Decided:

    September 1, 2015

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Allen R. Lamont, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl OShea, OFFICE


    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Allen R. Lamont appeals the district courts order denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2012)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    Lamont v. Sgt. Crews, No. 1:14-cv-00853-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. May 1,


    2015).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like